Scores Table and Rules
If the review does not obey these standards, it will be refused
10.0	Excellent	Top High Quality (*1)(*2)
9.5	Super TQA
9.0	TQA
8.5	Very Good	Very good works
8.0	Good
7.5	Above Average	Average The relative average of a specific genre (*2)
7.0	Average
6.5	Below Average
6.0	Almost Average
5.5	Rather Inadequate	Unsatisfactory
5.0	Inadequate
4.5	Almost Poor	Poor
4.0	Rather Poor
3.5	Poor
3.0	Pretty Poor
2.5	Very Poor
2.0	Almost Garbage	Garbage
1.5	Rather Garbage
1.0	Garbage
0.5	Pretty Garbage
0.0	Pure Garbage

(1) The minimum score for a TQA vote is 9.00.

(2) It is a quality level ranking based on COMPARISON that says: piece X under reviewing has the same quality value Q as known piece Y, which I know is considered Q by most people and experts in the genre (not only me).
Example: a work has quality similar to a known excellent work (let's say 9.5) then it is scored 9.5. If its quality is similar to an average work then it gets a 7.0. And so on.
This way we set a standard to compare and qualify for all reviewers.
We use six criteria: themes, orchestration, harmonies, development, taste and originality. Each criteria must be judged separately the best we can, avoiding only-taste scoring.

(3) Submissions must be judged on the category submitted accordingly. Evaluate the COMPOSITION and not the PERFORMANCE.